37
Total Responses
3.2
Avg. Influence Score
Time
Top Challenge
WG2
Most Valuable Report

Respondent Roles Distribution

Reading Frequency by Role

Primary Purpose for Reading IPCC Reports

Influence Score Distribution

📊 Demographic Insights

  • Scientists/Researchers represent the largest group (54% of respondents)
  • Policymakers show high engagement with monthly reading frequency
  • Educators primarily use reports for educational activities
  • CSOs focus on advocacy and public awareness efforts

Most Valuable Report Sections

Engagement Level by Role

Working Group 1

Physical Science Basis

65% find valuable

Working Group 2

Impacts & Adaptation

78% find valuable

Working Group 3

Mitigation

72% find valuable

Key Challenges in Accessing IPCC Reports

⏰

Time Constraints

Most cited challenge across all user groups

78% of respondents
📄

Report Length

Extensive documents difficult to navigate

65% of respondents
🔤

Technical Language

Complex terminology barriers

52% of respondents
🌍

Regional Relevance

Limited regional-specific information

32% of respondents
🎯

Most Valuable Content

  • Summary for Policymakers (89%)
  • Figures & Visualizations (76%)
  • Case Studies (68%)
  • Fact Sheets (54%)
📈

Communication Preferences

  • Direct IPCC Communications (43%)
  • Workshops & Conferences (38%)
  • Traditional Media (29%)
  • Social Media (24%)
💡

Key Recommendations

  • Develop more concise summary formats
  • Increase regional-specific content
  • Simplify technical language
  • Expand workshop programs for practitioners
🌱

Impact on Climate Action

  • High influence on policy development
  • Strong role in educational activities
  • Critical for advocacy efforts
  • Essential for research justification
"Information needs to be simplified, but not lessened, in order to be disseminated to as wide an audience as possible. People need to experience exactly how these findings and predictions will affect their specific lives."
— Survey Respondent, Scientist/Researcher